|
|
Post by Georgia on May 29, 2009 2:23:35 GMT -5
I'm confident that I'm not wasting any time by creating this thread and posting. If the Spies were to Imprison me... then they would be silly. Jaya kind of connected the two of us with her negative vote for me. Donald is my numero uno at the current point in time. I think it will be a bit hard to actually focus on the other people; especially those whom I haven't been in a group with prior to the no-more-group-thing. xD Just a couple of thoughts on people/things. Tiberius + Thor: Tools. Nothing more. Donald: Number One Suspect Yvette + Ariel + Thor + Tiberius + Faith + Iris: I think that covers "the group" of people involved in the Robert vs. Yvette plan, as well as the "last minute" lynch of Jaya. Which I think is TOTAL bullshit. I highly doubt it was last minute. Ariel + Mei + Yvette: Top three people I would like to lynch and/or stab, just for the hell of it.  Jaya + Gretchen: The chat which Gretchen posted, looked... more like two spys conversing with each other, than anything else. Levi + Mei: I wouldn't be surprised if they were both spies. Amelia: I wouldn't be surprised if she is a spy. It is definitely an appropriate time to be looking into dynamics between people, and seeing connections. Post Second Exile, gives way more information at this point. Though, the burg seems awfully quiet to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Georgia on Jun 2, 2009 18:27:02 GMT -5
Today, about seven minutes ago:
...spies6Jenya (16:18:28): And trying to figure out who people are voting for.
spies6Jenya (16:18:45): Who do you think should be exiled tonight?
..
Rofl. Usually people don't phrase it that way. I read it as "I'm trying to figure out who people are voting for, so I can place my vote accordingly. Don't want to exile one of my SpyMates, if possible."
|
|
|
|
Post by Georgia on Jun 2, 2009 18:29:13 GMT -5
[color=Roxy[/color]
Newbie. Yes she is. But I hate hate hate when people write a player off as something, and then seemingly ignore them the rest of the game. To where in the end, they are completely NOT what you wrote them off as, and they bite you in the ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by Georgia on Jun 2, 2009 20:03:45 GMT -5
This chat, totally had me cracking up. Complete and utter bullshit.
spies6Georgia (15:34:16): I think it'll come down to where the followers go.
spies6Georgia (15:35:13): I don't know. I've been leaning towards Donald, since before Kristen posted her case against him. But Thor and Tiberius could get it. I'd like to vote Roxy for bandwagoning, but meh.
spies6levi (15:35:44): Why Thor or Tiberius?
spies6levi (15:35:55): You're the first person I've heard mention them
spies6Georgia (15:36:27): Thor and Tiberius are followers. they are easily influenced by others. Tiberius has even admitted yet.
spies6Georgia (15:36:46): Whether or not that is a spy thing; it certainly isn't a pro-citizen thing to do.
spies6Georgia (15:37:5): *Tiberius has even admitted it.
spies6levi (15:37:24): Hmmm, I hadn't really thought about them as suspects
spies6levi (15:37:50): I know that I do trust Thor a little more than Tib though
spies6Georgia (15:40:8): It is my opinion that citizens have the luxury and job to point the fingers at everyone they find suspicious. Especially, first. So those who just sit around and tend to agree with other cases against people; it is lazy, and not a procitizen thing to do.
spies6levi (15:40:42): I agree with that point
spies6Georgia (15:40:44): Thor and Tiberius are the biggest tools.
spies6Georgia (15:40:58): Tiberius admits and acknowledges it. I don't think Thor does.
spies6Georgia (15:41:22): Roxy, and Donald are other followers.
spies6Georgia (15:41:34): I'm sure there are more, but I haven't looked at everyone.
spies6levi (15:41:56): This Exile is about evidence more than behavior for me
spies6levi (15:42:0): Which is why I'm voting Yvette
spies6Georgia (15:45:36): Even though she isn't here to respond?
spies6levi (15:45:43): Yes
spies6levi (15:45:54): I don't like voting someone who can't defend themselves
spies6levi (15:46:2): But I don't agree with any of the other cases presented
spies6Georgia (15:46:35): Why don't you present your own case? Or just feel like being lazy?
spies6levi (15:47:17): Because the person I have the best case for is Yvette
spies6levi (15:47:29): I had seen certain things about her
spies6levi (15:47:34): And Jason posted before me
spies6levi (15:47:45): He brought up some things I had seen, and other things I hadn't
spies6levi (15:47:49): ANd I added to what he presented
spies6Georgia (15:47:54): So why not add your own points?
spies6levi (15:48:9): spies6levi (5:48:00 PM): ANd I added to what he presented
spies6Georgia (15:56:21): You added one thing?
spies6levi (15:56:36): That is correct
spies6levi (15:57:32): If I have one thing to add, I add that one thing
spies6levi (15:57:33): If I had two things to add, I would add two thigns
spies6levi (15:57:33): But I added one thing
spies6levi (15:57:34): Because I only had one thing
spies6Georgia (16:02:23): Wouldn'tb behavior of a person, be evidence?
spies6levi (16:02:42): There's a fine line between that
spies6levi (16:02:56): When I say "behavior," I mean a person's tendencies
spies6levi (16:03:12): What their personality is like, what their contribution level is like
spies6levi (16:03:24): When I say "evidence" I mean specific things that you can point out
spies6levi (16:03:43): Saying "That person will follow along with anything" is behavior
spies6levi (16:04:0): Saying "That person bandwagoned on this particular case, and I can prove it" is evidence
spies6Georgia (16:04:31): So having a tendency of bandwagoning, if you have evidence to prove it. Would be behavior?
spies6Georgia (16:05:3): What is proof of bandwagoning? Wouldn't just their tendency to vote for the popular candidates, be enough proof?
spies6levi (16:06:14): Yes
spies6levi (16:06:27): Proof of bandwagoning is being able to point out a specific post or a specific vote
spies6levi (16:06:42): Like "John voted for Jane but didn't weigh in on the case against Jane at all"
spies6levi (16:06:46): That's evidence
spies6levi (16:06:59): "I've noticed that John will go along with whatever the popular opinion is"
spies6levi (16:07:4): That's analyzing John's behavior
spies6levi (16:07:9): Like I said, its a fine line
spies6levi (16:07:18): But that's how I interpret those words when it comes to mafia
spies6Georgia (16:07:27): Why wouldn't analyzing someone's behavior, be evidence?
spies6levi (16:07:58): Both are forms of scumhunting
spies6levi (16:08:4): Behavor and evidence combine to make a case
spies6levi (16:08:16): Again, it all comes down to how you interpret the words
spies6levi (16:08:27): Each person is going to have a different interpretation
spies6Georgia (16:08:41): So why is this episode more about evidence than behavior to you?
spies6levi (16:08:42): I'm not contesting the validity of either point
spies6levi (16:08:55): I'm going by evidence that points to Yvette
spies6levi (16:09:0): There are specific things
spies6levi (16:09:15): The surprised reaction to Paris not being a cit at the last exile
spies6levi (16:09:24): Her bandwagon post on the case against me
spies6levi (16:09:33): Her involvement in the fake case debacle
spies6Georgia (16:10:17): Why not Thor? He has done similar things.
spies6levi (16:10:38): I haven't seen them
spies6levi (16:11:15): And I trust Thor from conversations that I have had with him
spies6levi (16:11:38): Convos that I have had with Yvette do not lead me to trust her
spies6Georgia (16:12:27): Ahh.
spies6Georgia (16:12:43): What is the difference between voting with popular opinion and bandwagoning?
spies6levi (16:13:2): Nothing
spies6levi (16:13:13): They are two different ways of stating the same idea
spies6Georgia (16:13:46): Ahh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ellis on Aug 8, 2009 20:30:40 GMT -5
[/color] Newbie. Yes she is. But I hate hate hate when people write a player off as something, and then seemingly ignore them the rest of the game. To where in the end, they are completely NOT what you wrote them off as, and they bite you in the ass. [/quote] *cough*PETE*cough*  I love these little dramatic ironies that constantly creep into the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Kirsten on Aug 8, 2009 20:50:58 GMT -5
Roxy is a color?
|
|
|
|
Post by Georgia on Aug 8, 2009 22:10:23 GMT -5
Roxy is a shade of white. So close to white, you can hardly tell the difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mei Yun on Aug 8, 2009 23:46:08 GMT -5
Ariel + Mei + Yvette: Top three people I would like to lynch and/or stab, just for the hell of it. You got two of your wishes this episode! |
|
|
|
Post by Jason on Aug 9, 2009 0:28:21 GMT -5
Episode 3 was Georgia's wet dream come true!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariel on Aug 9, 2009 19:21:32 GMT -5
*stabs Christina*
|
|
|
|
Post by Georgia on Aug 11, 2009 0:22:40 GMT -5
*gets the flute out*
xD
|
|
|
|
Post by Mei Yun on Aug 11, 2009 12:20:05 GMT -5
-fucked up C# major chord-
|
|
