|
Post by Jaya on May 15, 2009 19:43:53 GMT -5
1. They just look guilty. (Callahan looks evil. Khalad is a moslem, and therefore must be an evil terrorist spy.)
2. They are inactive, or not helping cits.
3. I just don't like them. They were rude to me -- or, better, they were rude to [insert beloved cit name here].
I'm sure yall can come up with some better ones.
|
|
|
Post by Donald on May 15, 2009 22:02:24 GMT -5
1. Isn't a convincing reason, we shouldn't use it, it's just reaching for an exile. 2. Exiling inactives is a policy some people go by, but we shouldn't propose it or push it much in my opinion. Not helping cits is a good reason, though. Spies have a reason to not help cits, but cits don't. Therefore, if they're not helping cits, they're probably spies. 3. Is a spiteful reason for pushing for somebody's exile. We could attack somebody for attacking an [obviously cit player], and point out how bad their play, reasoning, and logic is for voting that player.
Other reasons: - They are inconsistent with what they say.
- He/she says one thing, then does something completely different, such as saying "Jaya is definitely town" then trying to get Jaya exiled shortly thereafter.
- He/she is just pushing for exiling any player, she doesn't care who she actually gets exiled.
- She is blatantly protecting [suspicious player], who has been acting very suspicious as well.
And of course, once the game starts and we get our roles, we can discuss over AIM how to get people lynched, protect each other, etc.
|
|