Post by Georgia on May 20, 2009 2:28:01 GMT -5
spies6Ariel is available (15:15:42)
spies6Ariel (15:15:4): Hello, Georgia. I haven't gotten a chance to speak with you yet; how are you?
spies6Ariel is available (15:16:13)
spies6Ariel is available (15:31:3)
spies6Ariel is available (15:16:41)
spies6Ariel (15:16:52): Hungry, but otherwise fine.
spies6Ariel is available (15:18:48)
spies6Georgia (15:19:20): That is good, besides the hunger.
spies6Ariel (15:19:39): Haha, it's easily fixed, though.
spies6Ariel is available (15:25:15)
spies6Ariel is available (15:20:28)
spies6Georgia (15:21:33): I do have a suspicion, however I am holding on to it until I have a chance to speak with the person further. As right now it is simply a gut feeling, and to go off just that is a bit ridiculous. When I have the chance to speak further with them before bringing it to everyone else.
spies6Ariel (15:22:4): Understandable. I don't mind voicing suspicions if I have them, but I would surely attempt to speak somewhat indepth with the person before going so far as to vote them.
spies6Ariel is available (15:22:23)
spies6Georgia (15:25:41): The problem with voicing all and every suspicion you have, before you've had the chance to really speak with them - is that the spies could try and jump on nothing and turn it into something.
spies6Ariel is available (15:26:19)
spies6Ariel (15:26:45): True, but then that could also be construed as a bit of a giveaway, couldn't it?
spies6Ariel is available (15:27:4)
spies6Georgia (15:31:31): It could. However if they do it subtlely then it wouldn't. Whispers here, whispers there.
spies6Ariel (15:32:15): Too subtly, however, and they wouldn't get anything done. And you have the advantage of public opinion.
spies6Georgia (15:33:45): Public opinion. Yes, public opinion. It isn't really public opinion when you have seven people conspiring together.
spies6Ariel (15:34:50): Yes, but the 25 other people could be construed as "public opinion".
spies6Georgia (15:35:20): True. Unless each spy buddies and influences just one person. Then the seven turns into fourteen.
spies6Ariel (15:35:51): You're assuming that the seven that the spies pick on are easily influenced. And if they aren't?
spies6Georgia (15:36:8): Why couldn't the spies seek out those most easily influenced?
spies6Georgia (15:36:36): Or for that matter, someone whom seems to agree with them on a certain matter.
spies6Georgia (15:37:32): I'm not saying that everyone is so easily impressionable. However I think it could be done.
spies6Ariel (15:37:41): Because the Spy and the Citizen seem to agree on one matter, it doesn't follow that they would agree on everything.
spies6Ariel (15:37:44): Oh, I agree that it's possible.
spies6Georgia (15:40:3): I agree. Nothing will be agreed on unanimously. Nor does it mean that agreement on one thing, will lead to agreement on all things. I just think that it could be done.
spies6Ariel (15:41:7): Yes, definitely possible. It looks like we'll have to agree to disagree, no?
spies6Georgia (15:42:5): Yes.
<I just saw this emoticon. I made me laugh.
spies6Ariel (15:15:4): Hello, Georgia. I haven't gotten a chance to speak with you yet; how are you?
spies6Ariel is available (15:16:13)
spies6Ariel is available (15:31:3)
spies6Ariel is available (15:16:41)
spies6Ariel (15:16:52): Hungry, but otherwise fine.
spies6Ariel is available (15:18:48)
spies6Georgia (15:19:20): That is good, besides the hunger.
spies6Ariel (15:19:39): Haha, it's easily fixed, though.
spies6Ariel is available (15:25:15)
spies6Ariel is available (15:20:28)
spies6Georgia (15:21:33): I do have a suspicion, however I am holding on to it until I have a chance to speak with the person further. As right now it is simply a gut feeling, and to go off just that is a bit ridiculous. When I have the chance to speak further with them before bringing it to everyone else.
spies6Ariel (15:22:4): Understandable. I don't mind voicing suspicions if I have them, but I would surely attempt to speak somewhat indepth with the person before going so far as to vote them.
spies6Ariel is available (15:22:23)
spies6Georgia (15:25:41): The problem with voicing all and every suspicion you have, before you've had the chance to really speak with them - is that the spies could try and jump on nothing and turn it into something.
spies6Ariel is available (15:26:19)
spies6Ariel (15:26:45): True, but then that could also be construed as a bit of a giveaway, couldn't it?
spies6Ariel is available (15:27:4)
spies6Georgia (15:31:31): It could. However if they do it subtlely then it wouldn't. Whispers here, whispers there.
spies6Ariel (15:32:15): Too subtly, however, and they wouldn't get anything done. And you have the advantage of public opinion.
spies6Georgia (15:33:45): Public opinion. Yes, public opinion. It isn't really public opinion when you have seven people conspiring together.
spies6Ariel (15:34:50): Yes, but the 25 other people could be construed as "public opinion".
spies6Georgia (15:35:20): True. Unless each spy buddies and influences just one person. Then the seven turns into fourteen.
spies6Ariel (15:35:51): You're assuming that the seven that the spies pick on are easily influenced. And if they aren't?
spies6Georgia (15:36:8): Why couldn't the spies seek out those most easily influenced?
spies6Georgia (15:36:36): Or for that matter, someone whom seems to agree with them on a certain matter.
spies6Georgia (15:37:32): I'm not saying that everyone is so easily impressionable. However I think it could be done.
spies6Ariel (15:37:41): Because the Spy and the Citizen seem to agree on one matter, it doesn't follow that they would agree on everything.
spies6Ariel (15:37:44): Oh, I agree that it's possible.
spies6Georgia (15:40:3): I agree. Nothing will be agreed on unanimously. Nor does it mean that agreement on one thing, will lead to agreement on all things. I just think that it could be done.
spies6Ariel (15:41:7): Yes, definitely possible. It looks like we'll have to agree to disagree, no?
spies6Georgia (15:42:5): Yes.
<I just saw this emoticon. I made me laugh.