Post by Rey on May 25, 2009 23:31:11 GMT -5
spies6Paris (10:58:17 PM): I was trying to make a case to Khaled this past hour
spies6Paris (10:58:27 PM): under the impression that Roxy was already exiled and was flipped citizen
spies6Paris (10:59:09 PM): but would it make sense to make a case against someone on the logic, (since you and Roxy) were nearly split in votes, that it was wiser to vote you?
spies6Paris (10:59:37 PM): The fact that the vote was so narrowly split, if one person popped citizen, wouldn't town gain information if they voted the other person out as well
spies6MeiYun (11:00:44 PM): so youd exile me for information is that what you would get at?
spies6Paris (11:01:11 PM): yes, hypothetically
spies6Paris (11:01:22 PM): this was only in the event roxy was already exiled and flipped
spies6MeiYun (11:01:56 PM): i think my vote on roxy vote is justified and she acted like a spy
spies6MeiYun (11:02:01 PM): have you read my case on her?
spies6Paris (11:02:18 PM): I'm not even talking about the case in general but just out of basic trying to gain knowledge
spies6Paris (11:02:30 PM): take all the suspicions aside and base it on the fact that two people were narrowly split in votes
spies6Paris (11:02:39 PM): at an exile and one of them left, but the other remains
spies6Paris (11:02:46 PM): however the person that leaves is a citizen
spies6Paris (11:02:58 PM): would it make sense to vote the other person out to gain info
spies6Paris (11:03:09 PM): it has nothing really to do with you vs roxy. its a matter of if its a right step
spies6MeiYun (11:03:10 PM): good try but lemme tell you why its basically wrong
spies6MeiYun (11:03:27 PM): one dont you think my leadership and activity is an asset right now
spies6MeiYun (11:03:52 PM): two there is a chance both of us are citizens so you are basically setting us for a back to back lynch
spies6Paris (11:04:30 PM): right so your saying the risk that comes with that approach = back to back lynch but there is always the "What if scenario"
spies6MeiYun (11:04:30 PM): three you assumption lies that one of us is a spy, for your plan to be successful i am not sure of that
spies6Paris (11:04:43 PM): right
spies6Paris (11:04:47 PM): which is the what if
spies6MeiYun (11:04:50 PM): no you are the one who What iffing me
spies6MeiYun (11:04:50 PM): NO
spies6MeiYun (11:04:59 PM): listen
spies6MeiYun (11:05:25 PM): you are lynching me on a what if that "WHAT IF ONE OF ROXY AND MEI IS A SPY BECAUSE THEIR VOTES ARE CLOSE"
spies6MeiYun (11:05:36 PM): i wont evn let you lynch roxy if that was the reason
spies6MeiYun (11:05:46 PM): YOU WERE THE ONE WHO DID A WHAT IF FIRST
spies6Paris (11:06:13 PM): it was a hypothetical question that had to be addressed. It was an approach I thought made sense honestly
spies6MeiYun (11:06:17 PM): NO
spies6MeiYun (11:06:22 PM): in my case it doesnt make sense
spies6MeiYun (11:06:47 PM): because is based on an assumption that one of us two is a spy which is unfair for one or both of us citizens
spies6MeiYun (11:07:00 PM): totally unfair and doo doo
spies6Paris (11:07:09 PM): ok gotcha. No, your reasoning makes sense based on "assumptions" that can't really be justified
spies6MeiYun (11:07:40 PM): that is an easy way out in my opinion
spies6MeiYun (11:07:50 PM): why dont you try looking for spies for a change based on REAL evidence?
spies6MeiYun (11:07:55 PM): who have you talked to for this round?
spies6Paris (11:08:08 PM): but depending on what cases there are, would there be exceptions to that?
spies6Paris (11:08:21 PM): im talking to khaled you and oswald. Only people ive talked to on our team. Rey is the only other person
spies6MeiYun (11:08:25 PM): that is why you have to scumhunt
spies6MeiYun (11:08:36 PM): you have to find the cases or support the cases
spies6MeiYun (11:08:52 PM): or in your case find an evidence against the case
spies6Paris (10:58:27 PM): under the impression that Roxy was already exiled and was flipped citizen
spies6Paris (10:59:09 PM): but would it make sense to make a case against someone on the logic, (since you and Roxy) were nearly split in votes, that it was wiser to vote you?
spies6Paris (10:59:37 PM): The fact that the vote was so narrowly split, if one person popped citizen, wouldn't town gain information if they voted the other person out as well
spies6MeiYun (11:00:44 PM): so youd exile me for information is that what you would get at?
spies6Paris (11:01:11 PM): yes, hypothetically
spies6Paris (11:01:22 PM): this was only in the event roxy was already exiled and flipped
spies6MeiYun (11:01:56 PM): i think my vote on roxy vote is justified and she acted like a spy
spies6MeiYun (11:02:01 PM): have you read my case on her?
spies6Paris (11:02:18 PM): I'm not even talking about the case in general but just out of basic trying to gain knowledge
spies6Paris (11:02:30 PM): take all the suspicions aside and base it on the fact that two people were narrowly split in votes
spies6Paris (11:02:39 PM): at an exile and one of them left, but the other remains
spies6Paris (11:02:46 PM): however the person that leaves is a citizen
spies6Paris (11:02:58 PM): would it make sense to vote the other person out to gain info
spies6Paris (11:03:09 PM): it has nothing really to do with you vs roxy. its a matter of if its a right step
spies6MeiYun (11:03:10 PM): good try but lemme tell you why its basically wrong
spies6MeiYun (11:03:27 PM): one dont you think my leadership and activity is an asset right now
spies6MeiYun (11:03:52 PM): two there is a chance both of us are citizens so you are basically setting us for a back to back lynch
spies6Paris (11:04:30 PM): right so your saying the risk that comes with that approach = back to back lynch but there is always the "What if scenario"
spies6MeiYun (11:04:30 PM): three you assumption lies that one of us is a spy, for your plan to be successful i am not sure of that
spies6Paris (11:04:43 PM): right
spies6Paris (11:04:47 PM): which is the what if
spies6MeiYun (11:04:50 PM): no you are the one who What iffing me
spies6MeiYun (11:04:50 PM): NO
spies6MeiYun (11:04:59 PM): listen
spies6MeiYun (11:05:25 PM): you are lynching me on a what if that "WHAT IF ONE OF ROXY AND MEI IS A SPY BECAUSE THEIR VOTES ARE CLOSE"
spies6MeiYun (11:05:36 PM): i wont evn let you lynch roxy if that was the reason
spies6MeiYun (11:05:46 PM): YOU WERE THE ONE WHO DID A WHAT IF FIRST
spies6Paris (11:06:13 PM): it was a hypothetical question that had to be addressed. It was an approach I thought made sense honestly
spies6MeiYun (11:06:17 PM): NO
spies6MeiYun (11:06:22 PM): in my case it doesnt make sense
spies6MeiYun (11:06:47 PM): because is based on an assumption that one of us two is a spy which is unfair for one or both of us citizens
spies6MeiYun (11:07:00 PM): totally unfair and doo doo
spies6Paris (11:07:09 PM): ok gotcha. No, your reasoning makes sense based on "assumptions" that can't really be justified
spies6MeiYun (11:07:40 PM): that is an easy way out in my opinion
spies6MeiYun (11:07:50 PM): why dont you try looking for spies for a change based on REAL evidence?
spies6MeiYun (11:07:55 PM): who have you talked to for this round?
spies6Paris (11:08:08 PM): but depending on what cases there are, would there be exceptions to that?
spies6Paris (11:08:21 PM): im talking to khaled you and oswald. Only people ive talked to on our team. Rey is the only other person
spies6MeiYun (11:08:25 PM): that is why you have to scumhunt
spies6MeiYun (11:08:36 PM): you have to find the cases or support the cases
spies6MeiYun (11:08:52 PM): or in your case find an evidence against the case